Responding to Calvinist Arguments for Limited Atonement

In this video I will be handling the following Calvinist objections to the idea that Jesus died for all people.
1) Trinitarian Harmony in the Atonement. This involves the idea that there is conflict between the intention of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit if Jesus meant to die for all people.
2) The idea that if Jesus tried to save all people but didn’t then He failed. Therefore Jesus didn’t try to save all and didn’t die for all people.
3) The idea that Jesus’ atonement and intercession are the same in extent and application.
4) Dilemmas Calvinists sometimes present as logically forcing you to affirm limited atonement. In particular we will look at John Owen’s dilemma/trilemma
5) The double-payment or double-jeopardy argument. This says that if Jesus died for all then to punish anyone in the future would be to punish sin twice and would threaten God’s justice.

I’m actually covering more than this but this is the main focus.

Here is my original video making a case for unlimited atonement https://youtu.be/DAKyQrAO3ps

Here is Dr. White’s video in response to my video (most of what I’m reacting to today was found in his response) https://youtu.be/BruZNUk2ltA

Here is a playlist of all my videos related to the topic of Calvinism. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oxakEl8BYBE&list=PLZ3iRMLYFlHu8PlY0J-G2B9Pyp59S0pLZ

Finally, this is an in house discussion and I affirm Calvinists as my beloved brothers and sisters and would welcome them in full fellowship (and so should you).

If you love this ministry and want to partner in supporting it please click below to go to my web site. https://biblethinker.org/index.php/donate

BibleThinker mugs are available here https://www.zockollpottery.com/product-page/bible-thinker-mug