Articles by BibleThinker

Sye Ten Bruggencate is a well known proponent of a certain style of evangelism called “Presuppostional Apologetics” which tends to discount all other forms of apologetics. I (Mike Winger) think that this method seems to go against biblical teaching and examples. Listen as the two of us talk through the issues.
Link to Sye’s movie “How to Answer the Fool”:https://youtu.be/aQKjUzotw_Y Link to Mike’s critique of presuppositional apologetics: https://youtu.be/6MovatsIoDULink to Sye’s YouTube channel:https://www.youtube.com/user/ProofThatGodExists

Everything from the nature of demons to whether God’s sovereignty makes Him the cause of evil. This was a very interesting Q&A and I hope that it answers some of your questions as well.
 

Examining the Bible to find out who Melchizedek was and how he relates to Jesus. Some think he was a Christophany and others that he is just a type of Christ. I will lay out some reasons for why I see him as a type of Christ and we will learn some principles to add to our tool kit for finding other types of Christ in the Old Testament.
Melchizedek shows up out of nowhere in Genesis 14 and then, in Psalm 110 we hear a promise from God that the Messiah will be a priest after the order of Melchizedek. Finally, the book of Hebrews offers us divinely inspired commentary on the nature of Melchizedek, and that is where the real debate lies. Is Hebrews speaking of Melchizedek in a literal sense or in a literary sense when it says “without father without mother and without genealogy”?

Methodical study of multiple passages in the Old Testament that seem to present examples of Christ showing up before the incarnation. This is part 5 of the long series “How to Find Jesus in the Old Testament” which seeks to build a biblically sound case for seeing Jesus in typology and other ways throughout the Old Testament. Here is a link to the full playlist (which is being added to almost every week at the time I write this). https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLZ3iRMLYFlHsHyvMtfgOgSPU6zEnCvxUO

Here’s the link to the video I mentioned where I explain how Christophanies do not challenge the doctrine of the incarnation. https://youtu.be/ryCyQ4N08Q0

How can this “Angel of the Lord” be YHWH and not be YHWH at the same time? This is a thoughtful survey of the passages of the Bible where the angel of the LORD shows up and we seek to identify exactly WHO he is based on clues from the text.

Here is the playlist for all the Jesus in the OT videos (added as they are made) https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLZ3iRMLYFlHsHyvMtfgOgSPU6zEnCvxUO

How is the bronze serpent a type of Christ? Jesus said, “as moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness so the Son of Man must be lifted up”. We can learn how to see types of Christ when we see that Jesus is not only giving us an analogy but wonderful insights into how we can discover types of Christ in the Old Testament. This is part 3 in the long series on Jesus in the OT, watch the whole series to learn all the principles of how to find Jesus in the OT.

Link to this series playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLZ3iRMLYFlHsHyvMtfgOgSPU6zEnCvxUO

In what specific ways is Adam a type of Christ? In this series we discuss typology of Christ in the Old Testament and focus on learning principles that will give us the ability to better find Jesus in the Old Testament. We also handle a couple objections to finding Jesus in the Old Testament.

Here is the whole playlist for Jesus in the OT – https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLZ3iRMLYFlHsHyvMtfgOgSPU6zEnCvxUO

This video is to help people stuck in the WMSCOG and to expose the truth about who AhnSahngHong really was. Above all else two facts stand out about the real AhnSahngHong. 1- He didn’t think he was Christ. 2- He openly taught against God the mother. Check below for the links I mentioned in the video.
Link to the video where I debunk WMSCOG propaganda about “God the Mother” https://youtu.be/Q0LhGhJDXtA
Link to the translation of the book where AhnSahngHong spoke against God the Mother, “The New Jerusalem and the Bride: Interpretation on Women’s Veil” http://ncpcog.co.kr/rb/home/b/0604/441

In this series we will seek to understand how the New Testament finds Jesus in the Old Testament in order to learn principles that will guide us in our own reading of the Old Testament so that we can discover Jesus there as well. This message is about laying a foundation for seeing Jesus in the Old Testament by surveying what Jesus said about Jesus in the Old Testament and seeing how the book of Acts models preaching Jesus from the Old Testament. In fact, all of the New Testament seems to be built on the idea that Jesus IS in the Old Testament. This is the first video in a series on how to find Jesus in the Old Testament.

Debate topic “Is Water Baptism Required for Salvation?”Debaters: Dean Meadows (https://apologiainstitute.com) and Mike Winger (https://biblethinker.org)Positions: Dean Meadows; that water baptism is required for salvation. Mike Winger; that water baptism is not required for salvation.
Verse reference map: in many instances we come back to a verse after it is first discussed. I only included the first time a passage is brought up in this map.Acts 2 vs 36-41 – 2:56Matthew 3 vs 11 – 8:30Mark 1 vs 4-5 – 11:00Luke 24 vs 44-49 – 15:34Acts 10 vs 43-48 – 29:09Acts 11 vs 15 – 32:49Eph 1 vs 13, 2 Cor 1 vs 22 – 45:07Colossians 2 6-12 – 59:53Romans 2 vs 23 – 01:06:23Acts 8 vs 38-39 – 01:22:09Thief on the Cross (Luke 23 vs 39-43, Mark 15 vs 32, Matthew 27 vs 41-44) 01:24:53Hebrews 9 vs 16-18 – 01:28:33Romans 4 vs 23-25 – 01:46:10 and 03:10:59Acts 18 vs 24-28 – 01:59:40Acts 19 vs 1-5 – 02:07:43Romans 5 vs 20 through 6 vs 4 – 02:17:18Romans 6 vs 15-17 – 02:19:20Romans 2 vs 26-29 – 02:24:341 Cor 12 vs 13 – 02:26:58Romans 1 vs 5 – 02:32:58Romans 16 vs 26 – 02:34:14Romans 4 – 03:10:12Romans 10 vs 9-13 – 02:39:03Acts 22 vs 16 – 02:54:12Joel 2 vs 32 – 02:56:47Acts 22 – 02:58:15Acts 9 vs 18-19 – 03:04:47 Gen 4 vs 26, 21 vs 33, Acts 2 vs 21, 7 vs 59, 1 Cor 1 vs 2, 2 Tim 2 vs 22 – 03:05:57Hebrews 11 vs 8-9 – 03:14:26Matt 18 vs 18-20 – 03:43:101 Peter 3 vs 18-22 – 03:52:51